12-12-2025, 12:29 PM
And another kits nightmare ... haha ... PE Part is not matching. Wohhooo ... So WHAT is wrong? PE or Part?
![[Image: 4f02a8a387ae368859c941589f16.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/98/d5/4f02a8a387ae368859c941589f16.jpg)
![[Image: 09a282ce0ddf230995f8e4b0c8c1.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/6d/0a/09a282ce0ddf230995f8e4b0c8c1.jpg)
B6 defines the wide of the front gunport. At least it should as there are no drawings of such a complex part.
And it seems the gunport part is too wide now
Otherwise when comparing the instructions drawing and what I built it looks quite similar in size.
h
Gunport has the exact same size as the stern ones. Coincidence?
![[Image: e021c9e86c9f3db74522d759bdea.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/86/d9/e021c9e86c9f3db74522d759bdea.jpg)
I checked everything again, and the way I did it, it "must" be correct. You can see in the picture the angle I had to saw for the part; I didn't saw away too much, just what the angle required.
![[Image: 8da6a8eb09ca967c842f674aa10b.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/4e/86/8da6a8eb09ca967c842f674aa10b.jpg)
If I had done it so that the etched part would fit, there would be a huge gap because the 3D-printed hull would be "wrong". Basically, however, according to the original plans, it seems that the gunport is a little too wide even it is now the exact shape as the gunport at the stern. F*** it, nothing I am willing to chance, it tells the story. I will split the PE part ;-)
Anyway another example for not testing kit designs. It's frustrating ... I feel like an alpha tester though ... haha
cheers
Dirk
![[Image: 4f02a8a387ae368859c941589f16.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/98/d5/4f02a8a387ae368859c941589f16.jpg)
![[Image: 09a282ce0ddf230995f8e4b0c8c1.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/6d/0a/09a282ce0ddf230995f8e4b0c8c1.jpg)
B6 defines the wide of the front gunport. At least it should as there are no drawings of such a complex part.
And it seems the gunport part is too wide now
Otherwise when comparing the instructions drawing and what I built it looks quite similar in size.
h
Gunport has the exact same size as the stern ones. Coincidence?
![[Image: e021c9e86c9f3db74522d759bdea.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/86/d9/e021c9e86c9f3db74522d759bdea.jpg)
I checked everything again, and the way I did it, it "must" be correct. You can see in the picture the angle I had to saw for the part; I didn't saw away too much, just what the angle required.
![[Image: 8da6a8eb09ca967c842f674aa10b.jpg]](https://www.dubz-modelling-world.com/uploads/medium/4e/86/8da6a8eb09ca967c842f674aa10b.jpg)
If I had done it so that the etched part would fit, there would be a huge gap because the 3D-printed hull would be "wrong". Basically, however, according to the original plans, it seems that the gunport is a little too wide even it is now the exact shape as the gunport at the stern. F*** it, nothing I am willing to chance, it tells the story. I will split the PE part ;-)
Anyway another example for not testing kit designs. It's frustrating ... I feel like an alpha tester though ... haha
cheers
Dirk


